SRNST

Nampa Swim Team

63 athletes in resultsSR

AGE GROUP10 & under 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18

SEASON2025-26 2024-25 3 seasons

13-14 Girls · SCY · 3 seasons

3 girls aged 13-14 have SCY times here across the last 3 seasons combined.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 3 in the 100 Free, 2 in the 50 Free, 2 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 200 Free.

13-14 girls in the slice

Events covered

525

Median Power Points

SR #3

Headcount rank in the LSC

EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event

Tier spread (weak → strong)

Median

Fastest

50 Free

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

25.95

100 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

57.41

200 Free

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

2:38.49

500 Free

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

8:26.01

50 Back

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

32.23

100 Back

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

1:04.89

200 Back

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:21.43

50 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

42.64

50 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

46.89

100 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

1:04.98

200 IM

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:25.69

100 IM

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

1:06.27

BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale

IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest SR squads for this slice, beside Nampa Swim Team: 100 Free SCY · 13-14 girls · 3 seasons.

Nampa Swim Team

SRNST · SR · current

In this event3

Median—

Fastest57.41

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

Boise YMCA Swim Team

SRBY · SR

In this event22

Median1:03.34

Fastest55.94

Elko Swim Team

SREST · SR

In this event2

Median—

Fastest1:00.32

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.

AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

63 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades

10 & under

11-12

13-14

15-16

17-18

19 & over

Girls Boys median shape of same-size SR clubs (5 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 47 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)

RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Nampa Swim Team in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26

10 & under

sample too small (1 < 6)

— · 1/1

11-12

sample too small (3 < 6)

— · 3/3

15-16

sample too small (3 < 6)

— · 3/3

17-18

sample too small (5 < 6)

— · 5/5

All ages

100% · 12/12

all SR clubs pooled (72% overall)

The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the SR marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.

MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores

2025–26 · 5 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

2024–25 · 6 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Nampa Swim Team counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.