SwimMeetIQ
NECRIM

Crimson Aquatics

731 athletes in resultsNE
17-18 Girls · SCY · 2025-26
12 girls aged 17-18 have a 2025-26 SCY time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 11 in the 50 Free, 11 in the 100 Free, 19 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 1650 Free.
12
17-18 girls in the slice
18
Events covered
574
Median Power Points
NE #5
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
11
26.29
24.10
100 Free
11
56.90
51.04
200 Free
8
2:00.14
1:49.16
500 Free
7
5:19.24
4:51.37
1000 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
9:58.18
1650 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
18:12.11
50 Back
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
27.91
100 Back
9
1:04.71
56.13
200 Back
9
2:13.69
2:00.11
50 Breast
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
32.54
100 Breast
10
1:13.91
1:01.79
200 Breast
8
2:35.55
2:13.34
50 Fly
6
29.92
26.98
100 Fly
8
1:02.67
54.15
200 Fly
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
1:56.19
200 IM
6
2:14.72
2:00.56
400 IM
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
4:15.79
100 IM
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
1:07.57
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest NE squads for this slice, beside Crimson Aquatics: 50 Free SCY · 17-18 girls · 2025-26.
Crimson Aquatics
NECRIM · NE · current
In this event11
Median26.29
Fastest24.10
The Current
NECS · NE
In this event27
Median25.86
Fastest22.30
In this event22
Median26.31
Fastest23.34
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

731 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
161
11-12
112
13-14
79
15-16
61
17-18
32
19 & over
7
Girls Boys median shape of same-size NE clubs (7 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 279 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Crimson Aquatics in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
10 & under
97% · 146/150
11-12
96% · 95/99
13-14
91% · 78/86
15-16
78% · 57/73
17-18
88% · 45/51
All ages
92% · 425/463
all NE clubs pooled (88% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the NE marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 64 meets
Local / in-house
62
Invitational
0
LSC championship
2
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
2024–25 · 141 meets
Local / in-house
129
Invitational
3
LSC championship
6
Sectional / zone
0
National
3
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Crimson Aquatics counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.