MWSO

Swim Omaha

251 athletes in resultsMW

AGE GROUP10 & under 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18

SEASON2025-26 2024-25 3 seasons

17-18 Boys · LCM · 2025-26

7 boys aged 17-18 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 3 in the 50 Free, 2 in the 100 Free, 1 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 200 Free.

17-18 boys in the slice

Events covered

593

Median Power Points

MW #6

Headcount rank in the LSC

EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event

Tier spread (weak → strong)

Median

Fastest

50 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

25.53

100 Free

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

58.09

200 Free

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

2:20.54

100 Back

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

1:02.33

200 Back

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

2:25.93

50 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

30.56

100 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

1:06.47

200 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

2:27.57

50 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

26.24

100 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

57.27

200 IM

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

2:11.25

400 IM

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

5:04.82

BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale

IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MW squads for this slice, beside Swim Omaha: 50 Free LCM · 17-18 boys · 2025-26.

Swim Omaha

MWSO · MW · current

In this event3

Median—

Fastest25.53

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

Club Husker

MWHUSK · MW

In this event4

Median—

Fastest25.24

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

Millard Aquatic Club

MWMAC · MW

In this event3

Median—

Fastest24.63

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.

AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

251 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades

10 & under

11-12

13-14

15-16

17-18

19 & over

Girls Boys median shape of same-size MW clubs (7 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 124 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)

RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Swim Omaha in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26

10 & under

sample too small (1 < 6)

— · 1/1

11-12

sample too small (4 < 6)

— · 4/4

13-14

sample too small (5 < 6)

— · 5/5

15-16

88% · 7/8

17-18

sample too small (4 < 6)

— · 4/4

All ages

96% · 23/24

all MW clubs pooled (97% overall)

The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MW marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.

MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores

2025–26 · 30 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

2024–25 · 5 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Swim Omaha counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.