MWSO

Swim Omaha

251 athletes in resultsMW

AGE GROUP10 & under 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18

SEASON2025-26 2024-25 3 seasons

10 & under Boys · LCM · 2025-26

14 boys aged 10 & under have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 4 in the 100 Free, 3 in the 50 Free.
Thinnest: 1 in the 200 Free.

10 & under boys in the slice

Events covered

213

Median Power Points

MW #3

Headcount rank in the LSC

EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event

Tier spread (weak → strong)

Median

Fastest

50 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

48.87

100 Free

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

1:42.95

200 Free

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

3:52.14

50 Back

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

47.90

100 Back

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

1:58.72

200 Back

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

3:57.93

50 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

1:01.66

100 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:15.81

200 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

5:06.45

50 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

1:05.73

100 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

2:25.77

200 IM

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

4:08.85

BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale

IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MW squads for this slice, beside Swim Omaha: 100 Free LCM · 10 & under boys · 2025-26.

Swim Omaha

MWSO · MW · current

In this event4

Median—

Fastest1:42.95

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

Greater Omaha Aquatics

MWGOAL · MW

In this event6

Median1:35.94

Fastest1:16.92

Millard Aquatic Club

MWMAC · MW

In this event5

Median—

Fastest1:30.04

sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)

All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.

AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

251 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades

10 & under

11-12

13-14

15-16

17-18

19 & over

Girls Boys median shape of same-size MW clubs (7 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 124 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)

RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Swim Omaha in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26

10 & under

sample too small (1 < 6)

— · 1/1

11-12

sample too small (4 < 6)

— · 4/4

13-14

sample too small (5 < 6)

— · 5/5

15-16

88% · 7/8

17-18

sample too small (4 < 6)

— · 4/4

All ages

96% · 23/24

all MW clubs pooled (97% overall)

The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MW marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.

MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores

2025–26 · 30 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

2024–25 · 5 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Swim Omaha counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.