MWHUSK

Club Husker

142 athletes in resultsMW

AGE GROUP10 & under 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18

SEASON2025-26 2024-25 3 seasons

13-14 Boys · LCM · 3 seasons

4 boys aged 13-14 have LCM times here across the last 3 seasons combined.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 4 in the 50 Free, 4 in the 100 Free, 3 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 400 Free.

13-14 boys in the slice

Events covered

362

Median Power Points

MW #13

Headcount rank in the LSC

EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event

Tier spread (weak → strong)

Median

Fastest

50 Free

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

25.48

100 Free

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

56.52

200 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

2:07.42

400 Free

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

4:35.20

100 Back

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

1:10.92

50 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

45.11

100 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

1:18.14

200 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

3:34.62

50 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

37.28

100 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

1:04.45

200 IM

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

2:23.58

400 IM

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

5:15.99

BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale

IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MW squads for this slice, beside Club Husker: 50 Free LCM · 13-14 boys · 3 seasons.

Club Husker

MWHUSK · MW · current

In this event4

Median—

Fastest25.48

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

Greater Omaha Aquatics

MWGOAL · MW

In this event20

Median30.32

Fastest26.44

Millard Aquatic Club

MWMAC · MW

In this event10

Median32.49

Fastest25.63

All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.

AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

142 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades

10 & under

11-12

13-14

15-16

17-18

19 & over

Girls Boys median shape of same-size MW clubs (6 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 26 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)

RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Club Husker in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26

15-16

sample too small (1 < 6)

— · 1/1

17-18

sample too small (1 < 6)

— · 1/1

All ages

sample too small (3 < 6)

— · 3/3

all MW clubs pooled (97% overall)

The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MW marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.

MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores

2025–26 · 23 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

2024–25 · 2 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Club Husker counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.