SwimMeetIQ
MWHLA

Heartland Aquatics

173 athletes in resultsMW
11-12 Boys · LCM · 2025-26
7 boys aged 11-12 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 4 in the 100 Free, 3 in the 50 Free, 3 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 400 Free.
7
11-12 boys in the slice
14
Events covered
324
Median Power Points
MW #9
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
29.12
100 Free
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
1:03.70
200 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
2:26.05
400 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
6:03.56
50 Back
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
34.95
100 Back
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
1:15.98
200 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
3:21.66
50 Breast
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
48.48
100 Breast
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
1:51.62
200 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
3:49.08
50 Fly
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
31.33
100 Fly
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
1:11.28
200 IM
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
2:41.22
400 IM
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
5:52.55
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MW squads for this slice, beside Heartland Aquatics: 100 Free LCM · 11-12 boys · 2025-26.
Heartland Aquatics
MWHLA · MW · current
In this event4
Median
Fastest1:03.70
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
In this event9
Median1:27.23
Fastest1:15.60
In this event6
Median1:29.22
Fastest1:22.28
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

173 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
13
11-12
14
13-14
29
15-16
28
17-18
17
19 & over
7
Girls Boys median shape of same-size MW clubs (6 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 65 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Heartland Aquatics in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
11-12
sample too small (1 < 6)
· 1/1
13-14
sample too small (1 < 6)
· 1/1
17-18
sample too small (1 < 6)
· 1/1
All ages
sample too small (3 < 6)
· 3/3
all MW clubs pooled (97% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MW marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 28 meets
Local / in-house
26
Invitational
1
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
1
National
0
2024–25 · 3 meets
Local / in-house
2
Invitational
0
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
0
National
1
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Heartland Aquatics counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.