SwimMeetIQ
Log inGet started free
MWGOAL

Greater Omaha Aquatics

MW
403 athletes in resultsMW
GENDERGirlsBoys
AGE GROUP10 & under11-1213-1415-1617-18
COURSESCYLCM
SEASON2025-262024-253 seasons
17-18 Boys · LCM · 2025-26
9 boys aged 17-18 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 3 in the 50 Free, 3 in the 100 Free, 4 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 2 in the 400 Free.
9
17-18 boys in the slice
11
Events covered
525
Median Power Points
MW #5
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
23.78
100 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
54.71
200 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
2:14.88
400 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
4:38.80
50 Back
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
30.90
100 Back
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
1:07.93
50 Breast
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
30.22
100 Breast
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
1:08.05
50 Fly
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
26.04
100 Fly
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
57.62
200 IM
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
2:20.14
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MW squads for this slice, beside Greater Omaha Aquatics: 50 Free LCM · 17-18 boys · 2025-26.
Greater Omaha Aquatics
MWGOAL · MW · current
In this event3
Median—
Fastest23.78
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
Club Husker
MWHUSK · MW
In this event4
Median—
Fastest25.24
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
In this event3
Median—
Fastest24.63
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

403 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
61
11-12
51
13-14
56
15-16
54
17-18
25
19 & over
4
Girls Boys median shape of same-size MW clubs (4 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 152 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Greater Omaha Aquatics in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
13-14
100% · 6/6
15-16
100% · 15/15
17-18
95% · 18/19
All ages
98% · 41/42
all MW clubs pooled (97% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MW marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 34 meets
Local / in-house
33
Invitational
0
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
1
National
0
2024–25 · 7 meets
Local / in-house
4
Invitational
0
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
0
National
3
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Greater Omaha Aquatics counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.