Utica Shelby Swim Club (MIUSSC)

AGE GROUP10 & under 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18

SEASON2025-26 2024-25 3 seasons

10 & under Boys · LCM · 2025-26

69 boys aged 10 & under have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 4 in the 200 Free, 3 in the 50 Free.
Thinnest: 1 in the 100 Fly.

69

10 & under boys in the slice

11

Events covered

414

Median Power Points

MI #2

Headcount rank in the LSC

EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Training partners for

Event

N

Tier spread (weak → strong)

Median

Fastest

50 Free

3

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

35.36

100 Free

3

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

1:25.20

200 Free

4

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

2:52.72

400 Free

2

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

6:07.87

50 Back

4

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

42.20

100 Back

4

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

1:31.09

50 Breast

3

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

51.37

100 Breast

2

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

1:49.90

50 Fly

3

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

41.93

100 Fly

1

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

2:01.55

200 IM

2

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

3:22.69

BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale

IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MI squads for this slice, beside Utica Shelby Swim Club: 200 Free LCM · 10 & under boys · 2025-26.

Utica Shelby Swim Club

MIUSSC · MI · current

In this event4

Median—

Fastest2:52.72

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

Birmingham Blue Dolphins

MIBBD · MI

In this event0

Median—

Fastest—

no 200 Free LCM times in this slice

Oly Swimming

MIOLY · MI

In this event2

Median—

Fastest2:54.62

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.

AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

722 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades

10 & under

150

11-12

104

13-14

98

15-16

60

17-18

24

19 & over

0

Girls Boys median shape of same-size MI clubs (11 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 286 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)

RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Utica Shelby Swim Club in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26

10 & under

96% · 95/99

11-12

97% · 96/99

13-14

99% · 81/82

15-16

96% · 47/49

17-18

93% · 28/30

All ages

97% · 349/361

all MI clubs pooled (91% overall)

The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MI marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.

MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores

2025–26 · 50 meets

Local / in-house

44

Invitational

2

LSC championship

4

Sectional / zone

0

National

0

2024–25 · 60 meets

Local / in-house

49

Invitational

4

LSC championship

4

Sectional / zone

0

National

3

Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Utica Shelby Swim Club counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.