SwimMeetIQ
MIRS

Royal Swimming

293 athletes in resultsMI
13-14 Boys · LCM · 2025-26
24 boys aged 13-14 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 8 in the 100 Free, 7 in the 50 Free, 2 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 2 in the 800 Free.
24
13-14 boys in the slice
16
Events covered
431
Median Power Points
MI #9
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
7
31.69
27.56
100 Free
8
1:09.33
1:00.61
200 Free
6
2:34.56
2:15.90
400 Free
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
4:49.94
800 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
10:19.28
1500 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
19:56.17
50 Back
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
33.92
100 Back
9
1:19.83
1:10.79
200 Back
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
2:41.82
100 Breast
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
1:21.14
200 Breast
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
3:07.03
50 Fly
6
32.86
29.31
100 Fly
7
1:16.86
1:05.56
200 Fly
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
2:36.19
200 IM
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
2:31.86
400 IM
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
5:34.86
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MI squads for this slice, beside Royal Swimming: 100 Back LCM · 13-14 boys · 2025-26.
Royal Swimming
MIRS · MI · current
In this event9
Median1:19.83
Fastest1:10.79
In this event11
Median1:17.63
Fastest1:06.50
Club Wolverine
MICW · MI
In this event17
Median1:19.93
Fastest1:06.92
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

293 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
91
11-12
53
13-14
40
15-16
24
17-18
15
19 & over
0
Girls Boys median shape of same-size MI clubs (27 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 70 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Royal Swimming in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
10 & under
90% · 43/48
11-12
95% · 18/19
13-14
91% · 21/23
15-16
82% · 9/11
17-18
sample too small (5 < 6)
· 5/5
All ages
91% · 96/106
all MI clubs pooled (91% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MI marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 30 meets
Local / in-house
25
Invitational
1
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
2024–25 · 48 meets
Local / in-house
41
Invitational
3
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Royal Swimming counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.