SwimMeetIQ
Log inGet started free
MIRS

Royal Swimming

MI
293 athletes in resultsMI
GENDERGirlsBoys
AGE GROUP10 & under11-1213-1415-1617-18
COURSESCYLCM
SEASON2025-262024-253 seasons
15-16 Boys · LCM · 2025-26
5 boys aged 15-16 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 2 in the 50 Free, 2 in the 100 Free, 3 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 400 Free.
5
15-16 boys in the slice
10
Events covered
502
Median Power Points
MI #34
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
26.22
100 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
56.53
200 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
2:05.58
400 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
4:49.28
50 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
32.86
100 Back
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
1:09.54
200 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
2:31.80
100 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:33.07
50 Fly
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
27.86
100 Fly
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
1:06.39
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MI squads for this slice, beside Royal Swimming: 50 Free LCM · 15-16 boys · 2025-26.
Royal Swimming
MIRS · MI · current
In this event2
Median—
Fastest26.22
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
In this event15
Median27.33
Fastest24.67
Oly Swimming
MIOLY · MI
In this event17
Median28.77
Fastest24.70
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

293 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
91
11-12
53
13-14
40
15-16
24
17-18
15
19 & over
0
Girls Boys median shape of same-size MI clubs (27 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 70 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Royal Swimming in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
10 & under
90% · 43/48
11-12
95% · 18/19
13-14
91% · 21/23
15-16
82% · 9/11
17-18
sample too small (5 < 6)
— · 5/5
All ages
91% · 96/106
all MI clubs pooled (91% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MI marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 30 meets
Local / in-house
25
Invitational
1
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
2024–25 · 48 meets
Local / in-house
41
Invitational
3
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Royal Swimming counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.