SwimMeetIQ
Log inGet started free
MILIFE

Lifetime

MI
409 athletes in resultsMI
GENDERGirlsBoys
AGE GROUP10 & under11-1213-1415-1617-18
COURSESCYLCM
SEASON2025-262024-253 seasons
17-18 Boys · LCM · 2025-26
6 boys aged 17-18 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 2 in the 50 Free, 2 in the 200 Free.
Thinnest: 1 in the 100 Free.
6
17-18 boys in the slice
10
Events covered
355
Median Power Points
MI #14
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
28.91
100 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:05.96
200 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
2:29.91
50 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
35.53
100 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:18.47
200 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
2:55.44
50 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
38.44
100 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:24.65
200 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
3:11.31
100 Fly
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:18.61
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MI squads for this slice, beside Lifetime: 50 Free LCM · 17-18 boys · 2025-26.
Lifetime
MILIFE · MI · current
In this event2
Median—
Fastest28.91
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
In this event11
Median27.02
Fastest25.24
Club Wolverine
MICW · MI
In this event16
Median25.63
Fastest23.95
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

409 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
94
11-12
62
13-14
44
15-16
34
17-18
9
19 & over
1
Girls Boys median shape of same-size MI clubs (20 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 165 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Lifetime in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
10 & under
90% · 46/51
11-12
90% · 43/48
13-14
85% · 34/40
15-16
100% · 17/17
17-18
100% · 7/7
All ages
90% · 148/164
all MI clubs pooled (91% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MI marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 47 meets
Local / in-house
43
Invitational
0
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
2024–25 · 42 meets
Local / in-house
36
Invitational
3
LSC championship
3
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Lifetime counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.