SwimMeetIQ
MIGLT

Michigan

230 athletes in resultsMI
17-18 Boys · LCM · 2025-26
4 boys aged 17-18 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 2 in the 50 Free, 2 in the 100 Free.
Thinnest: 1 in the 400 Free.
4
17-18 boys in the slice
8
Events covered
370
Median Power Points
MI #27
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
27.80
100 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
1:02.14
200 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
2:26.20
400 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
5:18.04
100 Back
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
1:16.59
200 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
2:53.90
100 Fly
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
1:10.86
200 IM
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
2:45.01
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MI squads for this slice, beside Michigan: 50 Free LCM · 17-18 boys · 2025-26.
Michigan
MIGLT · MI · current
In this event2
Median
Fastest27.80
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
In this event11
Median27.02
Fastest25.24
Club Wolverine
MICW · MI
In this event16
Median25.63
Fastest23.95
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

230 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
33
11-12
38
13-14
40
15-16
23
17-18
8
Girls Boys median shape of same-size MI clubs (36 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 88 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Michigan in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
10 & under
94% · 29/31
11-12
93% · 27/29
13-14
95% · 42/44
15-16
92% · 12/13
17-18
100% · 10/10
All ages
95% · 121/128
all MI clubs pooled (91% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MI marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 31 meets
Local / in-house
27
Invitational
0
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
2024–25 · 25 meets
Local / in-house
19
Invitational
2
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Michigan counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.