SwimMeetIQ
Log inGet started free
MIGLT

Michigan

MI
230 athletes in resultsMI
GENDERGirlsBoys
AGE GROUP10 & under11-1213-1415-1617-18
COURSESCYLCM
SEASON2025-262024-253 seasons
10 & under Boys · LCM · 2025-26
17 boys aged 10 & under have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 6 in the 50 Free, 5 in the 100 Free.
Thinnest: 1 in the 400 Free.
17
10 & under boys in the slice
12
Events covered
327
Median Power Points
MI #23
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
6
47.99
38.90
100 Free
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
—
1:27.83
200 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
3:15.09
400 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
6:46.49
50 Back
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
—
44.94
100 Back
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
1:37.77
200 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
3:30.96
50 Breast
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
49.89
100 Breast
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
1:50.09
50 Fly
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
47.17
100 Fly
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:55.74
200 IM
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
3:29.51
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest MI squads for this slice, beside Michigan: 50 Free LCM · 10 & under boys · 2025-26.
Michigan
MIGLT · MI · current
In this event6
Median47.99
Fastest38.90
In this event0
Median—
Fastest—
no 50 Free LCM times in this slice
In this event3
Median—
Fastest35.36
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

230 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
33
11-12
38
13-14
40
15-16
23
17-18
8
Girls Boys median shape of same-size MI clubs (36 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 88 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Michigan in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
10 & under
94% · 29/31
11-12
93% · 27/29
13-14
95% · 42/44
15-16
92% · 12/13
17-18
100% · 10/10
All ages
95% · 121/128
all MI clubs pooled (91% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the MI marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 31 meets
Local / in-house
27
Invitational
0
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
2024–25 · 25 meets
Local / in-house
19
Invitational
2
LSC championship
4
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Michigan counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.