CTCPAC

CP-AC Swimming

140 athletes in resultsCT

AGE GROUP10 & under 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18

SEASON2025-26 2024-25 3 seasons

13-14 Boys · SCY · 3 seasons

3 boys aged 13-14 have SCY times here across the last 3 seasons combined.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 3 in the 100 Free, 3 in the 200 Free, 3 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 100 Breast.

13-14 boys in the slice

Events covered

620

Median Power Points

CT #17

Headcount rank in the LSC

EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event

Tier spread (weak → strong)

Median

Fastest

50 Free

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

23.88

100 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

50.92

200 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

1:53.21

100 Back

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

58.00

200 Back

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:05.22

100 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

1:03.96

200 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

2:23.96

100 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

57.30

200 IM

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:06.78

400 IM

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

4:36.93

100 IM

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

58.42

BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale

IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest CT squads for this slice, beside CP-AC Swimming: 100 Free SCY · 13-14 boys · 3 seasons.

CP-AC Swimming

CTCPAC · CT · current

In this event3

Median—

Fastest50.92

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

Stamford Sailfish Aquatic Club

CTSSAC · CT

In this event5

Median—

Fastest50.73

sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)

Westport Westin Family YMCA Wa

CTWRAT · CT

In this event5

Median—

Fastest50.67

sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)

All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.

AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

140 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades

10 & under

11-12

13-14

15-16

17-18

Girls Boys median shape of same-size CT clubs (18 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 90 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)

RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for CP-AC Swimming in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26

11-12

sample too small (1 < 6)

— · 0/1

13-14

sample too small (4 < 6)

— · 3/4

15-16

95% · 18/19

17-18

94% · 16/17

All ages

91% · 40/44

all CT clubs pooled (93% overall)

The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the CT marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.

MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores

2025–26 · 4 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

2024–25 · 6 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining CP-AC Swimming counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.