CTCPAC

CP-AC Swimming

140 athletes in resultsCT

AGE GROUP10 & under 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18

SEASON2025-26 2024-25 3 seasons

17-18 Boys · SCY · 2024-25

12 boys aged 17-18 have a 2024-25 SCY time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 7 in the 200 Free, 4 in the 50 Free, 8 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 50 Back.

17-18 boys in the slice

Events covered

667

Median Power Points

CT #1

Headcount rank in the LSC

EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event

Tier spread (weak → strong)

Median

Fastest

50 Free

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

20.29

100 Free

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

45.24

200 Free

1:48.07

1:39.83

500 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

4:47.15

50 Back

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

26.83

100 Back

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

50.91

200 Back

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

1:50.80

100 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)

—

58.64

200 Breast

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:07.16

100 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

50.66

200 IM

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

—

1:53.46

400 IM

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

4:07.35

BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale

IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest CT squads for this slice, beside CP-AC Swimming: 200 Free SCY · 17-18 boys · 2024-25.

CP-AC Swimming

CTCPAC · CT · current

In this event7

Median1:48.07

Fastest1:39.83

Farmington Valley YMCA Tsunami

CTFVYT · CT

In this event1

Median—

Fastest1:42.77

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

Greenwich Ywca Dolphins Swm Tm

CTGYWD · CT

In this event4

Median—

Fastest1:43.17

sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)

All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.

AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

140 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades

10 & under

11-12

13-14

15-16

17-18

Girls Boys median shape of same-size CT clubs (18 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 90 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)

RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for CP-AC Swimming in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26

11-12

sample too small (1 < 6)

— · 0/1

13-14

sample too small (4 < 6)

— · 3/4

15-16

95% · 18/19

17-18

94% · 16/17

All ages

91% · 40/44

all CT clubs pooled (93% overall)

The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the CT marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.

MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores

2025–26 · 4 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

2024–25 · 6 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining CP-AC Swimming counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.