17-18 Girls · SCY · 2025-26
3 girls aged 17-18 have a 2025-26 SCY time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 3 in the 50 Free, 3 in the 100 Free, 8 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 100 Back.
3
17-18 girls in the slice
CT #9
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT
How deep, per event
Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
24.55
100 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
53.17
200 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
—
1:53.98
500 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
5:12.72
100 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:01.86
100 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:13.76
50 Fly
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
28.12
100 Fly
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
56.86
200 Fly
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
2:06.79
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED
Same slice at other clubs
The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest CT squads for this slice, beside CP-AC Swimming: 50 Free SCY · 17-18 girls · 2025-26.
CP-AC Swimming
CTCPAC · CT · current
In this event3
Median—
Fastest24.55
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
In this event3
Median—
Fastest25.21
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
In this event2
Median—
Fastest24.72
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS
Who swims here, by age
140 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
Girls Boys median shape of same-size CT clubs (18 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 90 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION
Who came back this season
Of the swimmers who swam for CP-AC Swimming in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
11-12sample too small (1 < 6)
— · 0/1 13-14sample too small (4 < 6)
— · 3/4 all CT clubs pooled (93% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the CT marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE
How much this club races, and at what level
Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining CP-AC Swimming counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.
Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.