SwimMeetIQ
Log inGet started free
CTCPAC

CP-AC Swimming

CT
140 athletes in resultsCT
GENDERGirlsBoys
AGE GROUP10 & under11-1213-1415-1617-18
COURSESCYLCM
SEASON2025-262024-253 seasons
15-16 Boys · SCY · 2024-25
7 boys aged 15-16 have a 2024-25 SCY time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 2 in the 50 Free, 2 in the 100 Free, 6 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 500 Free.
7
15-16 boys in the slice
10
Events covered
704
Median Power Points
CT #7
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
22.30
100 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
47.40
200 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
—
1:42.22
500 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
4:44.69
1000 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
9:59.57
100 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:07.94
200 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
2:26.94
100 Fly
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
51.35
200 Fly
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
1:51.44
200 IM
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
—
2:11.69
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest CT squads for this slice, beside CP-AC Swimming: 50 Free SCY · 15-16 boys · 2024-25.
CP-AC Swimming
CTCPAC · CT · current
In this event2
Median—
Fastest22.30
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
Rapids Swim Team
CTRST · CT
In this event5
Median—
Fastest24.60
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
In this event3
Median—
Fastest22.20
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

140 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
6
11-12
4
13-14
5
15-16
20
17-18
15
Girls Boys median shape of same-size CT clubs (18 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 90 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for CP-AC Swimming in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
11-12
sample too small (1 < 6)
— · 0/1
13-14
sample too small (4 < 6)
— · 3/4
15-16
95% · 18/19
17-18
94% · 16/17
All ages
91% · 40/44
all CT clubs pooled (93% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the CT marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 4 meets
Local / in-house
3
Invitational
0
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
0
National
1
2024–25 · 6 meets
Local / in-house
5
Invitational
1
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining CP-AC Swimming counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.