SwimMeetIQ
CTCPAC

CP-AC Swimming

140 athletes in resultsCT
15-16 Girls · SCY · 2025-26
13 girls aged 15-16 have a 2025-26 SCY time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 13 in the 200 Free, 10 in the 50 Free, 32 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 1000 Free.
13
15-16 girls in the slice
16
Events covered
639
Median Power Points
CT #3
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
10
25.39
23.00
100 Free
10
54.78
49.93
200 Free
13
2:00.30
1:49.03
500 Free
6
5:18.62
4:57.77
1000 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
10:54.15
50 Back
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
27.26
100 Back
7
1:02.06
57.38
200 Back
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
2:02.58
50 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
31.38
100 Breast
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
1:08.45
200 Breast
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
2:44.77
50 Fly
5
sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)
25.29
100 Fly
8
1:01.15
55.18
200 Fly
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
2:03.89
200 IM
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
2:16.16
400 IM
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
4:55.02
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest CT squads for this slice, beside CP-AC Swimming: 200 Free SCY · 15-16 girls · 2025-26.
CP-AC Swimming
CTCPAC · CT · current
In this event13
Median2:00.30
Fastest1:49.03
In this event6
Median2:15.10
Fastest2:05.46
In this event7
Median2:01.77
Fastest1:55.13
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

140 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
6
11-12
4
13-14
5
15-16
20
17-18
15
Girls Boys median shape of same-size CT clubs (18 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 90 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for CP-AC Swimming in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
11-12
sample too small (1 < 6)
· 0/1
13-14
sample too small (4 < 6)
· 3/4
15-16
95% · 18/19
17-18
94% · 16/17
All ages
91% · 40/44
all CT clubs pooled (93% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the CT marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 4 meets
Local / in-house
3
Invitational
0
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
0
National
1
2024–25 · 6 meets
Local / in-house
5
Invitational
1
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining CP-AC Swimming counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.