SwimMeetIQ
CCUN-0

UnAttached

30 athletes in resultsCC
17-18 Boys · LCM · 2025-26
5 boys aged 17-18 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 4 in the 50 Free, 4 in the 100 Free, 8 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 400 IM.
5
17-18 boys in the slice
15
Events covered
626
Median Power Points
CC #3
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
23.89
100 Free
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
53.29
200 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
1:57.66
400 Free
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
4:20.66
50 Back
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
28.42
100 Back
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
1:00.83
200 Back
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
2:13.36
50 Breast
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
30.51
100 Breast
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
1:10.90
200 Breast
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
2:38.75
50 Fly
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
27.88
100 Fly
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
59.81
200 Fly
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
2:09.46
200 IM
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
2:12.16
400 IM
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
4:44.20
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest CC squads for this slice, beside UnAttached: 50 Free LCM · 17-18 boys · 2025-26.
UnAttached
CCUN-0 · CC · current
In this event4
Median
Fastest23.89
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
Clovis Swim Club
CCCLOV · CC
In this event10
Median26.57
Fastest24.73
In this event0
Median
Fastest
no 50 Free LCM times in this slice
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

30 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
0
11-12
0
13-14
2
15-16
4
17-18
8
19 & over
5
Girls Boys median shape of same-size CC clubs (4 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 11 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for UnAttached in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
11-12
sample too small (1 < 6)
· 0/1
13-14
sample too small (1 < 6)
· 0/1
15-16
sample too small (3 < 6)
· 0/3
All ages
sample too small (5 < 6)
· 0/5
all CC clubs pooled (73% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the CC marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 16 meets
Local / in-house
14
Invitational
2
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
0
National
0
2024–25 · 24 meets
Local / in-house
18
Invitational
2
LSC championship
1
Sectional / zone
1
National
2
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining UnAttached counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.