SwimMeetIQ
CCRA

Roadrunner Aquatic

213 athletes in resultsCC
13-14 Boys · LCM · 2025-26
5 boys aged 13-14 have a 2025-26 LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 4 in the 100 Free, 3 in the 50 Free, 4 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 200 Free.
5
13-14 boys in the slice
14
Events covered
353
Median Power Points
CC #3
Headcount rank in the LSC
EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event
N
Tier spread (weak → strong)
Median
Fastest
50 Free
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
29.23
100 Free
4
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
1:02.44
200 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
2:13.89
400 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
4:33.98
800 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
9:29.86
1500 Free
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
18:09.25
50 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
43.36
100 Back
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
1:32.12
200 Back
1
sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)
2:46.89
50 Breast
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
55.73
100 Breast
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
1:58.81
50 Fly
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
31.99
100 Fly
3
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
1:11.62
200 IM
2
sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)
2:42.20
BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale
IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest CC squads for this slice, beside Roadrunner Aquatic: 100 Free LCM · 13-14 boys · 2025-26.
Roadrunner Aquatic
CCRA · CC · current
In this event4
Median
Fastest1:02.44
sample too small for a distribution (4 < 6)
Clovis Swim Club
CCCLOV · CC
In this event8
Median1:03.21
Fastest55.61
In this event3
Median
Fastest1:00.77
sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)
All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.
AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

213 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades
10 & under
13
11-12
23
13-14
20
15-16
16
17-18
3
19 & over
3
Girls Boys median shape of same-size CC clubs (4 clubs) — a reference, not a grade+ 135 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)
RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Roadrunner Aquatic in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26
10 & under
93% · 14/15
11-12
96% · 25/26
13-14
100% · 22/22
15-16
83% · 15/18
17-18
90% · 9/10
All ages
94% · 90/96
all CC clubs pooled (73% overall)
The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the CC marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.
MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores
2025–26 · 20 meets
Local / in-house
16
Invitational
2
LSC championship
0
Sectional / zone
2
National
0
2024–25 · 35 meets
Local / in-house
28
Invitational
2
LSC championship
1
Sectional / zone
1
National
3
Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Roadrunner Aquatic counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.