AZNEP

Swim Neptune

379 athletes in resultsAZ

AGE GROUP10 & under 11-12 13-14 15-16 17-18

SEASON2025-26 2024-25 3 seasons

13-14 Boys · LCM · 3 seasons

19 boys aged 13-14 have a 3 seasons LCM time here.
Free is the deepest stroke here — 3 in the 50 Free, 3 in the 100 Free, 2 of them AA or better.
Thinnest: 1 in the 400 Free.

13-14 boys in the slice

Events covered

508

Median Power Points

AZ #1

Headcount rank in the LSC

EVENT BY EVENT

How deep, per event

Event

Tier spread (weak → strong)

Median

Fastest

50 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

28.21

100 Free

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

1:02.16

200 Free

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:32.22

400 Free

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

4:49.27

800 Free

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

9:27.87

1500 Free

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

17:53.04

50 Back

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

—

37.11

100 Back

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

1:22.04

200 Back

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:48.59

50 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

32.80

100 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (1 < 6)

—

1:08.46

200 Fly

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

—

2:24.75

BBBAAAAAAAAAAno published tiersegment length = swimmers per tier · light → dark = the results page’s own scale

IF YOU SWITCHED

Same slice at other clubs

The comparison families actually make — not which club scores higher, but whether your swimmer would still have people to train with in this event. The two biggest AZ squads for this slice, beside Swim Neptune: 50 Free LCM · 13-14 boys · 3 seasons.

Swim Neptune

AZNEP · AZ · current

In this event3

Median—

Fastest28.21

sample too small for a distribution (3 < 6)

Pheonix Swim Club

AZPSC · AZ

In this event5

Median—

Fastest29.20

sample too small for a distribution (5 < 6)

Mesa Aquatics Club

AZMAC · AZ

In this event2

Median—

Fastest29.60

sample too small for a distribution (2 < 6)

All three columns present numbers only — no rankings, no grades, no verdicts. Cells with fewer than 6 swimmers say so instead of drawing a distribution. Pick a swimmer above to see how many ±2% training partners each club would offer.

AGE GROUPS

Who swims here, by age

379 swimmers on the public roster — counts, not grades

10 & under

11-12

13-14

15-16

17-18

Girls Boys+ 194 with no current age on file (not binned — an old age is not aged forward)

RETENTION

Who came back this season

Of the swimmers who swam for Swim Neptune in 2024-25 — how many are here in 2025-26

10 & under

100% · 10/10

11-12

100% · 19/19

13-14

97% · 35/36

15-16

98% · 47/48

17-18

95% · 37/39

All ages

97% · 151/156

all AZ clubs pooled (84% overall)

The mid-teens drop-off is sport-wide, not one club’s story — read every row against the AZ marker, never in isolation. Age groups are the swimmer’s age at the end of 2024-25; swimmers with no birth date on file are counted in All ages only. Membership is counted from published swims, so a swimmer who hasn’t raced yet in 2025-26 still counts as here while the roster carries them.

MEET CADENCE

How much this club races, and at what level

Distinct meets the current roster swam at — counting meets, never scores

2025–26 · 6 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

2024–25 · 15 meets

Local / in-house

Invitational

LSC championship

Sectional / zone

National

Meets are attributed through the current roster’s published swims, so a season a swimmer raced before joining Swim Neptune counts toward the meets they attended then. Numbers describe; they do not rank.

Built from publicly published meet results. Athlete counts reflect swimmers appearing in the results on SwimMeetIQ, not official club membership.